meistermash wrote:Wanted a house howitzer barrel, 18 1/2" so I found a place selling Mossberg made 870 barrels. Under a $100 out the door cylinder bore. It looks like a 2 piece affair however.
What do you mean by two-piece? Factory 870 barrels consist of a single-piece barrel/extension with a brazed-on guide ring. Is this how the Mossberg barrel is built? Or does it have an extension that's separate from the barrel?
meistermash wrote:Shot it today with some really old fed steel 3" loads. Think 30 years or so old.
My question is, had a few times where I pulled back on the slide and fired it. Then of course I slammed the slide shut but only there was no shell being chambered. It extracted fine.
Am I just to quick with this thing or is there a problem I should look for?
I believe the slide was all the way back in those instances.
A short-stroke is always a possibility if you're focusing on speed over everything else; but if you're yanking back on the fore-end as you're pulling the trigger, and using the gun's recoil to help slam the action open as quickly as possible, you can cause a no-feed malfunction where nothing is released from the magazine. As a result of the shells moving "forward" due to inertia and recoil (technically, the shells try to stay in place as the gun recoils rear-ward, but relative to the gun, they're shifting forward), the shell that is supposed to be feeding into the receiver ends up on the forward shell latch (the latch that's supposed to catch the next shell in the magazine) instead. A full magazine, especially an extended magazine, increases the likelihood of this, since more shells mean more inertia for the magazine spring to overcome. Shells that have more mass and/or more recoil (like 3" magnums, for example) also make no-feeds more likely, as does a worn-out or weak magazine spring. Here are a couple images illustrating how this works:
I would check your magazine spring; but as long as that's giving you good feed force, you shouldn't worry about this. There is
a mod that can prevent no-feeds, but it has some drawbacks, and it really isn't necessary for hunting/sporting or combat/defensive 870s. Realistically, cycling that quickly isn't the most effective way to shoot outside of some competition applications, and even then, it can easily make for sloppy technique. Plus, you generally don't want to use anything with magnum-level recoil for defense duty, since it'll slow down follow-up shots without adding enough lethality to make it worth it.
If you're interested in the physics, recoil energy scales off the square of momentum, so you hit diminishing returns pretty hard when moving up to heavier payloads. For example, if velocity is held constant, 12 00B pellets (a common 2.75" short magnum buckshot load) instead of 9 (standard 2.75" express load) means a 33.3% increase in pellets for a 77.8% increase in recoil, while 15 00B pellets (standard 3" 00B load) gets you 66.7% more pellets for a 177.8% jump in recoil.